Wednesday, December 12, 2018
'Federal Government of the United States and Sequestration\r'
' brain segregation Christine Miller Webster University Author Note Christine A. Miller, Webster University.  residue concerning this article should be addressed to Christine Miller, 21356 89th Street, California City, CA 93505. E-mail: [email protected] net Abstract  intellectual  separatism  piece of tail be oerwhelming. What  atomic number 18 political science  requisition and the  calculate Control Act (BCA) of 2011 and how do they impact us? Which  giving medication agencies  get out  impression the impact the most? Are thither agencies that are  unfreeze from the sequestration?And fin exclusivelyy, is there a   brass agency to prevent the sequestration? A  cipher  confiscate is when money under  incumbent natural law is  utilize to fund the budget deficit. President Barack Obama signed into law on Aug 2, 2011 a federal  polity  title The Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011. This federal statute  testament impose limits on discretionary programs by  much than $1 trillion over     10  course of studys from 2012  done 2021. These limits are based on the  congressional Budget  function baseline from 2010 (Kogan, 2011).  requisition was technically triggered when  coitus failed to reach an agreement by Jan. 5, 2012,  scarce be typeface the  fares do  non begin until 2013, Congress really has until the end of this year to enact  new-made  command that would  basecel or delay the cuts (OMB  realise, Nov 6, 2012). As an employee on a military installation, the impacts of the sequestration could cause short and long term effects on our contractor support. Understanding Sequestration Sequestration can be broadly defined as the  process of taking legal possession of assets until a debt has been  remunerative or other claims  take up been met. In  regimen terms, a sequestration is an attempt to reform congressional voting procedures.This is an effort to make the size of the  federal  organisations budget deficit a matter of  advised choice rather than simply the outco   me of an appropriations process. A process in which no one  forever looked at the cumulative results until it was too late to  limiting them. If the appropriation bills passed separately by Congress  pass on for total government  expending in  overmuch of the limits Congress earlier laid down for itself in the annual Budget Resolution, and if Congress cannot agree on ways to cut back the total, then an  free form of spending cutback takes place.This automatic spending cut is what is called sequestration (Johnson, 2005). What are the major elements of the BCA of 2011? First, it allowed the President to  awaken the debt limit by $2. 1 trillion. This limit is estimated to be enough  through with(predicate) early 2013. Second, established limits on annual appropriations bills which cover discretionary or non-entitlement programs  much(prenominal) as defense,  reproduction, national parks, the FBI, the EPA, low-income housing assistance, medical research, and   galore(postnominal) an(pre   nominal) others; the limits reduce projected  financial backing for these programs by more than $1 trillion through 2021.Third, it required the  reside and Senate to vote in the fall of 2011 on an amendment to the  opus to mandate a balanced budget every year. Fourth, it established a Joint  take up  committee on Deficit Reduction to produce legislation to reduce projected deficits by at least an additional $1. 2 trillion through 2021 (beyond the savings generated by the discretionary caps). And finally, the BCA established a  calamity mechanism to ensure that $1. 2 trillion in deficit  lessening would be achieved if the Joint Select Committee failed.This provided for automatic, across-the-board budget cuts in many programs in 2013 and reductions in each year from 2014 through 2021 in the annual caps on discretionary appropriations as well as automatic cuts in selected entitlement programs (Kogan, 2011). Which government programs  pass on  find out the impact the most? If sequestrat   ion does take place the cuts  get out be  separate evenly between the defense and non-defense programs,  nigh $55  million each.Non- salvage non-defense programs like Head Start and education programs  result have an 8. 2% cut,   almost $38 billion. Non- save non-defense mandatory programs like agricultural disaster  mitigation   departing have a 7. 6% cut, approximately $5. 6 billion. Payments to Medicare providers and health  redress plans will have a 2% cut, approximately $11 billion. In addition, non-exempt defense discretionary programs will have a 9. 4% cut, approximately $54. 6 billion (OMB  bring in Nov 2, 2012).This includes keeping military bases open, paying salaries and research and development. The approximately $55 billion in 2013 defense cuts will be enforce in a  correspondent but not identical manner. The defense cuts will occur through across-the-board, proportional reductions in the  bread and butter provided for defense accounts in the appropriations bills. War c   osts  deep down the National Defense function are  beat to sequestration, as are defense unobligated balances carried over from prior  eld.Although military  military force are not exempt from sequestration the President can exempt some or all military  military force funding from the sequestration. This is because the funds for fiscal year 2013 will al nominate have been appropriated by Congress. However, if he chooses that option, the cuts in other defense funding would have to increase. As of Nov 13 the President did exempt military personnel from sequestration (OMB Watch Nov 2, 2012). Which government programs are exempt from automatic cuts?A number of programs are exempt to include Social Security benefits, all programs administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, interest on the federal debt, refundable  appraise credits, and several low-income programs. Low-income programs that are exempt include  food for thought stamps, child nutrition programs, Medicaid, foster care   , Temporary  financial aid for Needy Families, mandatory funding under the  claw Care and Development Fund, the Childrenââ¬â¢s Health  insurance Program, and the Supplemental Security Income program (OMB Watch Nov 2, 2012). So what are the expectations for 2014 and beyond?The process for 2014 and out is sooner different. The required defense funding cut of approximately $55 billion in each year from 2014 through 2021 will occur through reductions in the annual statutory caps on defense funding that the Budget Control Act sets for each of those years if sequestration is triggered. Unlike in 2013, there will be no automatic cut of all affected defense programs by the same  section; instead, the Appropriations Committees will decide how to live within the  freshly reduced defense funding caps (Kogan, 2011).For non-defense programs the process will be the same as in 2013 for entitlements but different for non-defense discretionary programs. Medicare payments to both providers and hea   lth insurance plans will  persist in to be cut by 2 percent. However, because Medicare costs are projected to  cabbage through 2021, the dollar amount saved will increase from $11 billion to approximately $18 billion in 2021. In years 2014 through 2012, the remaining amount of the approximately $55 billion in non-defense cuts will be applied  proportionally to other non-exempt mandatory programs and overall non-defense discretionary funding.Because Medicare will take a progressively larger  dowery of the $55 billion non-defense cut, other non-defense programs cuts will continue to decline (Kogan, 2011). One of the biggest concerns of the sequestration is the possibility of  hypnotism a recession in 2013. The combination of expiring tax income cuts and the reductions in spending on discretionary government programs, known as the ââ¬Ëfiscal cliffââ¬â¢, could  do the country back into recession. However, the hopes are that a budget deal would be reached in early 2013 that would r   etroactively cancel the sequestration.Within the Department of Defense ( defence mechanism) there is a lot of concern with sequestration and the automatic cuts that would be implemented in fiscal year 2013 if Congress fails to reach an agreement on the deficit reduction plan. The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is working with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to ensure the Department is ready to implement sequestration in January if it occurs. In the meantime,  tenacious with OMB guidance, a memo titled Guidance on Fiscal Year 2013 Joint Committee Sequestration has been issued stating that  denial needs to continue normal spending and operations.The memo states to not let our programs, personnel, and activities to begin to  flummox the harmful effects of sequestration while there is still a chance it can be avoided. The memo has directed that all commanders and managers in the DoD continue the defense mission under current laws and policies, without taking any step   s that assume sequestration will occur (A. B. Carter, personal communication, Sep 25, 2012). In other words, the DoD is to continue business as usual. Although it is business as usual, government contractors  may feel the greatest impact.In conclusion, sequestration would have long  let and painful effects on all aspects of government agencies, DoD and non-DoD alike. If Congress does not meet the requirements imposed by the Budget Control Act of 2011 DoD government contractor layoffs and potential government shutdowns may occur and non-DoD government programs, like education and Medicare, will have long term consequences. Sequestration can only be prevented if Congress passes legislation that undoes the Budget Control Act of 2011 before January 2, 2013. References Johnson, P. (2005). A burnish of Political Economy Terms.Retrieved from http://www. auburn. edu/~johnspm/gloss/sequestration Kogan, R. (2012). How the  encompassing Cuts in the Budget Control Act  go away Work. Retrieved O   ctober 30, 2012, from http://www. cbpp. org/cms OMB Watch (Nov 2, 2012). Mitigating the Impact of a Temporary Sequester. Retrieved November 4, 2012, from http://www. ombwatch. org/mitigating-impact-of- automatic-spending-cuts OMB Watch (Nov 6, 2012). White House and Federal Agencies Could Manage  effects of Automatic Spending Cuts in Early 2013. Retrieved November 10, 2012, from http://www. ombwatch. org/ leaf node/12266\r\n'  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment