Critical Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory of Stereotyping

Stereotyping is a smorgasbord of pre judgement that is as customary in todays society as it was 2000 years ago. It is a well-disposed attitude that has stood the test of duration and received much management by social psychologists and philosophers alike. m each another(prenominal) flackes to, or theories of stereotyping have and then been raised. This essay evaluates the cognitive approach that classification is an essential cognitive process that inevitably leads to stereotyping. Hamilton (1979) calls this a depressing dilemma.\n\nBrowns (1995) rendering of stereotyping by means of disfavour is the holding of derogatory social attitudes or cognitive beliefs, the expression of ostracize affect, or the display of unfriendly or discriminatory demeanor towards divisions of a theme on account of their processship to that stem. This definition implies that stereotyping is primarily a class process, through the individuals psyches within that meeting. A further idea of stereotyping, outlined by Allport (1954) as thinking spastic of others without warrant, is that people make their mind up without whatsoever personal experience. This pre judgement close a whole group is then transferred to the stigmatisation of any individuals in that group. It is these ideas that the essay aims to evaluate, through the cognitive process of categorisation and the above definitions that bring astir(predicate) three distinct features of stereotyping, that our recognition jackpot be exhibit through.\n\nThe first characteristic of stereotyping is over-generalisation. A number of studies conducted found that diverse combinations of traits were associated with groups of different ethnic and home(a) origin (Katz and Braly, 1933). However, stereotyping does not intend that all members of a group are judged in these ways, ripe that a typical member of a group can be categorised in much(prenominal) judgements, that they possess the characteristics of the group . Still, when we lecturing of a group, we do so by imagining a member of that group.\n\nThe second feature and characteristic of stereotyping is the exaggeration of the difference betwixt ones own group (the in-group) and the other group (the out-group). This can be traced patronize to the bring in of Tajfel during the 1950s - the accentuation principle (Tajfel, 1981). Tajfels work was specifically on somatogenetic stimuli, and concluded that judgements on such stimuli are not make in isolation, but in the context of other factors. use socially - a judgement about an out-group relies upon other factors surround the judgement in question, as...If you need to get a across-the-board essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.