cold war Essay -- essays research papers

The cold struggle The arctic War was a response to the perceived threat by the get together States that Communism would interfere with national security and scotch risk in the world. It was a perceived threat by communist countries that the United States would take to the world. During the Cold War, the United States, Russia, and otherwise countries made efforts to avoid some other world war, while warring in proxy in other lands. The devastation caused by the hydrogen bombs exploded in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the next proficient advancements became only deterrents to the public. Governments had their own agenda which would result in worsening the judge between nations. The United States hid behind a curtain of nationalism resulting in increased hatred and mistrust between the people of the United States and Russia. Noam Chomsky reminds us that Communism is a broad term that includes those with the ability to get discipline of mass movements. Secretary of State John Fos ter Dulles at a time stated that, The poor people are the ones they appeal to and they have evermore wanted to plunder the rich. So, in one view, the U.S. mat they must be overcome, to protect our doctrine that the rich should ravage the poor. This became another motivation for the Cold War. In his historical account of the horizontalts leading to the Cold War, Jacob Heilbrunn reports that after gentleman War II, realists agreed that Soviet aggrandizement was responsible for the cold war. (Heilbrunn) They felt the reason, rather than Communism, Heilbrunn notes, was that Stalin was pursuing Russian national interests that dated back to the czars. Others, however, charge the president and Congress of following a consistent policy of economic imperialism, tracing it back to the Open Door Diplomacy of the nineteenth century, which outline an insatiable American appetite for new economic markets. (Heilbrunn) Heilbrunn says that Gabriel Kolko also felt that Roosevelts anti-Russia stance was formed to create dominance by the United States in world economic markets. (Heilbrunn) Heilbrunn says that Lefflers A Preponderance of Power, has become the dedicated text of the neo-revisionists. (Heilbrunn) Leffler claims that U.S. security policy was established between 1940 and 1946 based on geopolitics, not economics. Truman was far from fearing a Soviet military attack and was defend American economic stability... ...not easy accomplishments but were satisfied by the unceasing insistence of the threat of the great enemy. This phase has ended, but conflicts continue. The Soviet concretion may have called off the war, but the U.S. is continuing as before, even more freely with Soviet obstruction a thing of the past. George bush celebrated the symbolic end of the Cold War, the fall of the Berlin Wall, by right off invading Panama and announcing that the U.S. would overturn Nicaraguas election by maintaining its economic stranglehold and military attack unless our side won. With the threat of the Soviet sexual union no longer actual the U.S. is now free to use immeasurable force against almost anyone it may choose. The end of the Cold War has caused its problems as well as new enemies have needed to be invented. This problem has been work out quite easily if you were to look at the United States current multinational footing. A new and possibly better convincing enemy has been found in the likes of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. The U.S. government has continued a policy of convincing the American public of the great evil existing elsewhere to achieve their economic, technological and defensive objectives.